Baby Boomers have always been trendsetters. They were the first generation to rock out to bands such as the Beatles and they were the generation that was on the front
Continue Reading THE GRAY DIVORCE: BABY BOOMERS FLOCKING TO DIVORCE COURT IN DROVES
Prenuptial Agreements
THE INFORMATION ASYMMETRY AND THE DIVORCE PROCESS: AN UNLIKELY PAIR
What do divorce and economics have in common? Well, a lot. But today I am focusing on the unlikely link between the theory of information asymmetry – which deals with…
Continue Reading THE INFORMATION ASYMMETRY AND THE DIVORCE PROCESS: AN UNLIKELY PAIR
Tracking Finances: There’s a (New Jersey Divorce) App For That.
Oftentimes I hear from clients that gathering their financial information is the most daunting task they will face during the divorce process. They picture being buried in an avalanche of…
Continue Reading Tracking Finances: There’s a (New Jersey Divorce) App For That.
Pre-Nup Reform is Here
Back in October, I blogged about the potential amendments to the New Jersey’s Premarital Agreement Act. As of June 27, 2013, the proposed bill is now new law.
Prenuptial…
Continue Reading Pre-Nup Reform is Here
Coerced Prenuptial Agreement Set Aside – Continued
Yesterday, I posted on on the Petrakis case in New York where a coerced and fraudulently induced prenuptial agreement was set aside. This case has been all the buzz in…
Continue Reading Coerced Prenuptial Agreement Set Aside – Continued
Coerced Prenuptial Agreement Set Aside
How many prenuptial agreements have language in them that the parties are entering into the agreement free from duress, coercion, undue influence, etc? The answer is all of them. Some…
Prenuptial Agreement Reform in New Jersey Appears Likely
Is prenuptial agreement reform coming to New Jersey? It appears to be the case.
Prenuptial Agreements are meant to fix parties rights and responsibilities in advance, so as to avoid litigation and aggravation in the future. In fact, right up front in many if not most prenuptial agreements there is a "Statement of Intention" as follows:
It is the intention of the parties in entering into this Agreement that in the event of the termination of the marriage by divorce or death, certain rights shall be fixed in advance. It is their intention to avoid litigation and intrusion into their professional and personal lives and the lives of their families and business associates, which would perhaps otherwise occur if this Agreement had not been entered into.
Unfortunately, unlike in many other states, where prenuptial agreements are ironclad as long as there was full disclosure and the other procedural requirements are met, that has not been the case in New Jersey. The major reason for this is that in New Jersey, aside from setting aside a prenup due to failure to follow the procedural requirements, including full disclosure, agreements can be set aside if they are deemed to be unconscionable, not only when they are entered into, but when they are to be enforced at the time of the divorce. As a result, I have heard judges say that they have never enforced a prenuptial agreement. I have heard other judges give the rationale that because you don’t know what is going to happen in the future, it is unfair to enforce the agreement against a spouse where she/he waives alimony or the equitable distribution rights. That rationale misses the point as that is the entire reason for a prenuptial agreement.…
Continue Reading Prenuptial Agreement Reform in New Jersey Appears Likely
Rogers v. Gordon – The Next Chapter – This Time Counsel Fees
We previously blogged on the Appellate Division’s notable decision in Rogers v. Gordon, which addressed the legal standard applicable to prenuptial agreements signed prior to New Jersey’s enactment of…
Continue Reading Rogers v. Gordon – The Next Chapter – This Time Counsel Fees
PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS – ONE SIZE DOESN'T FIT ALL
We have blogged frequently regarding prenuptial agreements. There is also an advice piece on our firm’s web site entitled "Considering a Prenuptial Agreement – Should My Children Have One?" …
Continue Reading PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS – ONE SIZE DOESN'T FIT ALL
PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS PRE-DATING THE UNIFORM PREMARITAL AGREEMENT ACT – A DIFFERENT STANDARD FOR ENFORCEMENT
Are prenuptial agreements entered into before the enactment in 1988 of the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act in New Jersey in New Jersey analyzed for enforceability under the standards set forth in the Act? The simple answer is no, since the standard for determining the enforceability was established by earlier cases addresses addressing the issue.
There is a three (3) prong test to determine the enforceability of these pre-Act agreements. To be enforceable: (1) there must be “full disclosure by each party as to his or her financial conditions;” (2) the party sought to be bound by the agreement understood and accepted the terms of the agreement; and (3) the agreement is fair and not unconscionable – it will not "leave a spouse a public charge or close to it, or . . . provide a standard of living far below that which was enjoyed both before and during the marriage."
The party seeking to enforce the prenuptial agreement bears the burden of proving that there was full financial disclosure to the other party, the simplest way of which is to point to schedules attached to the agreement setting out – at least in general terms and with approximate values – the assets of the parties as well as their income over the past few years prior to the marriage. Simply put, a lack of full and complete financial disclosure in the agreement by one party prevents the other party from truly "accepting" its terms. The underlying rationale is that, with full and complete disclosure, the other party might have found the agreement unfair or might not have even gotten married.
…