Many couples in the midst of a divorce have very young children. As a result, the issue of funding their children’s college education is typically reserved until the child is
Continue Reading Retroactive College Contribution
Newburgh v. Arrrigo
Who Pays for What? Santions and the Obligation to Contribute to College
Previously I have blogged on both the issue of sanctions assessed by a court against one party in a divorce or post divorce matter and also the obligation to contribute to the costs of a college education for a child and to what extent.
These issues are often addressed to the Appellate Court of New Jersey as in many family law matters they are topics hot for debate. Most recently, the Appellate Division in the unpublished decision of Hikes v. Hikes, Decided August 13, 2009, Docket No. A-6642-06T2 addressed both the issue of sanctions and the payment of college for a child.
Sanctions may be requested by a party or granted by a court on its own in a situation where one party acts in extreme bad faith or is non-compliant. Sanctions can be viewed as a sort of punishment for that extreme bad faith or non-compliance. This is especially so when the other party acts in good faith and is complaint.Continue Reading Who Pays for What? Santions and the Obligation to Contribute to College
To Emancipate or Not To Emancipate – That Is the Question
Despite what people often think are iron-clad agreements, foolproof from any misinterpretation, despite best efforts, that may not always be the case. One area that has been given significant recognition…
Continue Reading To Emancipate or Not To Emancipate – That Is the Question
From Emancipation To College Expenses – What Is A Parent’s Financial Obligation?
Recently, I addressed the question as to when a child is emancipated under the eyes of New Jersey law. As I indicated there, the New Jersey Supreme Court defines emancipation as "the act by which a parent relinquishes the right to custody and is relieved of the duty to support a child." Newburgh v. Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529 (1982). A related question also addressed by the Court in Newburgh is a parent’s obligation to contribute towards a child’s postgraduate education expenses.
The Supreme Court in Newburgh set forth a non-exhaustive list of factors for a court to consider in determining a parent’s obligation to contribute to such educational expenses. These factors were subsequently codified by statute at N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) as follows:
1. Whether the parent, if still living with the child, would have contributed toward the costs of the requested higher education.
2. The effect of the background, values, and goals of the parent on the reasonableness of the expectation of the child for higher education.
3. The amount of the contribution sought by the child for the cost of higher education.
4. The ability of the parent to pay that cost.
5. The relationship of the requested contribution to the kind of school or course of study sought by the child.
6. The financial resources of both parties.
7. The commitment to and aptitude of the child for the requested education.
8. The financial resources of the child, including assets owned individually or held in custodianship or trust.
9. The ability of the child to earn income during the school year or vacation.
10. The availability of financial aid in the form of college grants and loans.
11. The child’s relationship to the paying parent, including mutual affection and shared goals as well as responsiveness to parental advice and guidance.
12. The relationship of the education requested to any prior training and to the overall long-range goals of the child.Continue Reading From Emancipation To College Expenses – What Is A Parent’s Financial Obligation?
When Is A Child Emancipated Under New Jersey Law?
A question faced by all parents is, when is a child emancipated in the eyes of the law? As set forth by the New Jersey Supreme Court, “emancipation is the act by which a parent relinquishes the right to custody and is relieved of the duty to support a child.” Newburgh v. Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529 (1982). The question and answer therefore have far reaching financial implications. However, emancipation does not occur at a fixed age. Rather, the inquiry is fact-specific.
This issue was recently taken on by the Appellate Division in the matter of Brandes v. Rigney, an unpublished opinion finding that the trial court applied improper legal principles in concluding that a child was emancipated. The parties at issue had three children before they were divorced in 1997. In 2004, the father, Brandes, sought to have the parties’ sons emancipated. The parties’ oldest son, Raymond, was born in 1982, while the other son, Eric, was born in 1985. The trial court denied Brandes’ motion at that time.Continue Reading When Is A Child Emancipated Under New Jersey Law?
Emancipated or Not?
In many divorce matters, attorneys, clients and judges alike must determine how to deal with the issue of support for children, oftentimes which includes the divvying up responsibility for payment…
Continue Reading Emancipated or Not?