One of the issues to resolve in a divorce cases is the allocation of the dependency exemptions. While the IRS says that they should go to the custodial parent, by
Continue Reading Making the Release of the Dependency Exemption Conditioned Upon the Receipt of the Child Support Due
Arrears
She Snoozed, She Lost
Usually, the "you snooze, you lose" defense is not often a successful legal tactic. However, in the recent unreported Appellate Division decision in Adler v. Adler the former wife’s application seeking unpaid child support, alimony and other obligations brought some 30 years later was denied essentially because she waited to long to collect. To read the full text of the decision, click here.
Pursuant to the Judgment of Divorce entered in 1973, the ex husband was required to pay $235 per week as undifferentiated child support and alimony until the oldest child was emancipated, at
which time the weekly support was to be reduced by $50 per week. That same $50 reduction was to occur when each of the two younger children became emancipated. The JOD also obligated
defendant to pay: the mortgage, taxes, insurance and utilities on the marital home; all reasonable and necessary medical expenses for the children; health insurance premiums for ex-wife and the children; $3,500 to the ex-wife on or before August 15, 1973; $6,231.85 for various unpaid bills arising during the marriage; college tuition for the parties’ three children; and orthodontic treatment for the parties’ two sons. Other than an enforcement Order from November 1973, there were no other Orders in the case. In addition, in 1975, the Probation Department closed their account, though arrears existed at that time, due to direct payments being made.
Between 1975 and 1978, the ex-husband stopped making payments. There was an enforcement motion filed in Maine in April 1978 and another Order entered later that year in Delaware County, New York that held the husband in contempt. Another enforcement motion was filed in late 1979 but their appears to be no further enforcement efforts taken thereafter.…
Wife's Delay in Seeking Child Support Arrears Does Not Act to Waive Claim
In an interesting opinion from the Appellate Division, Faro v. Randel R. Vonder Heyden, III, found here, the Appellate Division reversed a trial court’s denial of a plaintiff ex-wife’s…
Continue Reading Wife's Delay in Seeking Child Support Arrears Does Not Act to Waive Claim
Even Under Tragic Circumstances – Fault Once Again Rejected As Factor in Alimony
In late 2007, in Calbi v. Calbi, 396 N.J. Super. 592 (App. Div. 2007), the Appellate Division once again re-affirmed the notion that marital fault is all but irrelevant when…
Continue Reading Even Under Tragic Circumstances – Fault Once Again Rejected As Factor in Alimony