Although none of us can see the future (not yet anyway), when drafting a divorce agreement it is absolutely imperative to include as many potential future scenarios that you foresee
Continue Reading Spell Out Your Intentions When It Comes To Your Divorce Agreement
Lepis
TERMINATING ALIMONY FOR TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT – EASY, RIGHT? WRONG.
Recently I lost a dear client and friend, Bill*, after his long battle with brain cancer. Bill was a man with a kind-hearted spirit and a gentle disposition – one…
Continue Reading TERMINATING ALIMONY FOR TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT – EASY, RIGHT? WRONG.
Alimony Modification – A Judge's Checklist
Most people are aware that a supporting spouse may be entitled to modify an alimony obligation upon a showing of “changed circumstances.” However, many people do not know that the “leg-work” that they have to do to set themselves up to succeed on such a Motion begins long before the parties ever go to Court, especially if a supporting spouse is asking for relief on the basis of a purported job loss or reduction in income.
Below is a non-exhaustive list of items that a Judge will look for when a supporting spouse is requesting to reduce his or her alimony obligations:
• Has the applicant proven that his/her circumstances have changed such that he/she would be entitled to a child support or alimony reduction – Common scenarios constituting changed circumstances include:
o A reduction in a party’s income;
o Illness;
o Retirement;
o The receipt of an influx of liquid assets;
o Cohabitation of the supported spouse.…
Motions to Reduce Support: When Applications are Denied without a Plenary Hearing, What's Next?
In this economy, you would be surprised to see how many judges are jaded by applications brought by supporting spouses to reduce their support obligations based upon a reduction in income. After all, some judges entertain these applications on their daily docket and oftentimes see supporting spouses who are simply attempting to capitalize on the down economy and lack any actual merit to their cases. This blog post will explore one of the reactions by judges to this type of application; namely, denying the request of the supporting spouse outright without even holding a hearing, taking testimony, and making credibility findings.
Support obligations are always modifiable by the family court upon application of the supporting spouse. Typically, this type of application requires the supporting spouse to make a threshold prima facie showing that “changed circumstances have substantially impaired the ability to support himself or herself.” Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 157 (1980). When such a showing is made, the Court must next determine if a plenary hearing is warranted. This is sometimes referred to as the two-step Lepis analysis.…
Surely I can get my alimony reduced after a 17 month job search resulting in a job with a 22% reduction in income?
With the economic downturn and slow down in the economy since 2008, there has been a lot more post-judgment litigation to reduce alimony and child support. Much of this litigation…
Can a payor retire to get out of his limited duration alimony obligation?
As we know, limited duration alimony ("LDA") is alimony for a definite period of time. Unlike rehabilitative alimony where there is a goal in mind to be reached by the end of the rehabilitation period and which can possibly be extended of the goal has not been reached, per the statute, the term of LDA is not supposed to be able to be modified except for "unusual circumstances." Of course, even limited duration alimony is subject to modification based upon "changed circumstances." Of note, however, is that retirement has been recognized as a possible change of circumstances sufficient to seek a modification.
The issue of whether early retirement could be used by an alimony payor in order to terminate his LDA obligation was recently addressed in the case of Hendrickson v. Hendrickson, an unreported (non-precedential) opinion released on November 5, 2012. In that case, the parties agreed to an 8 year term of LDA at the time of the divorce in 2006, in the amount of $265 per week, that actually was reduced to $145 per week to take into account that the wife’s child support obligation because the husband had custody of the children.
The husband had been working at Fort Monmouth for more than 30 years when it closed in 2011. The husband asserted that though he had been offered a position in Aberdeen, Maryland, the net effect of the transfer would have resulted in a reduction of income and increased expenses. Moreover, he was able to retire for health reasons and collect his retirement benefits. As a result of a claimed inability to pay, the husband filed a motion to terminate his LDA obligation.
The trial court denied the request finding that the early retirement was not a change of circumstances. An unsuccessful motion for reconsideration was denied, as well. The Appellate Division affirmed the decision, but for different reasons.…
Continue Reading Can a payor retire to get out of his limited duration alimony obligation?
I'm Entitled To Cost of Living Increases on Alimony, Right?
Inflation impacts everyone, right? As a result, one would think that alimony would routinely be subject to cost of living adjustments (COLA). In fact, we know that Rule 5:6B of the…
Continue Reading I'm Entitled To Cost of Living Increases on Alimony, Right?
Another Reason To Settle – Parties Can Agree To Things that Judges Can’t Mandate – Like Automatic Reductions and Formulas for Alimony
When settling a case, the parties and their lawyers can be far more creative in settlement then a judge can be if the case is tried. While family judges have wide discretion in their decision making, creativity is crafting the most beneficial result for both parties is rarely something they can do. In fact, in many ways, they are constrained from the type of creativity that we see every day in divorce agreements.
What if you are a high earner, but your income fluctuates greatly from year to year? While a judge will likely have no choice but to determine your average income over 3 to 5 years and base support upon that as well as the rest of the statutory factors, you may want to agree on some kind of formula so that there is fairness year over year, i.e. you pay more in a better year and less in a down year. For example, if your average income is $2,500,000 but your income fluctuates between $1 million and $4 million per year. You would really hate paying alimony in those years you only make $1 million. If a judge decided this case using averages, you might be forced to pay your entire net income, or more, to you ex spouse in the down year. Similarly, a judge could never say that support "automatically" is reduced or even reviewed if your income is less than $X in the future.
This concept was reiterated again by the Appellate Division on October 29, 2012 in an unreported (non-precedential) decision in the case of Means v. Snipes. In this case, after a trial, the judge decided that in the event that defendant’s annual income fell below $2 million, he would receive a reduction in alimony. This is the one thing that both parties agreed was in error – a rare agreement in a very contentious case.…
STRIKEOUT? FORMER PITCHER GRANTED RELIEF ON MOTION TO REDUCE SUPPORT
While decisions from the Appellate Division addressing a former professional athlete’s motion to reduce his support obligations do not come around all that often, we have, in fact, previously blogged on the issue. Now from the Appellate Division comes the unpublished (not precedential) matter of Villone v. Villone, where the Appellate Division strictly relied on “triggering” language in the parties’ Marital Settlement Agreement in reversing and remanding a trial court’s decision that a former Major League Baseball pitcher was not entitled to a modification of support.
The matter involved that of former pitcher Ron Villone, who has played for more franchises than almost anyone else in the history of the game (an interesting record that was recently broken) – 12 to be exact as of Spring Training 2011, when he was released by the Washington Nationals and signed with the Somerset Patriots (an independent, minor league baseball club). He became well known for his travels, earning the nickname “Suitcase” Villone from teammates. Also interesting is that his current wife is on the reality show “Baseball Wives”, which, in the context of asking for a support reduction could provide potential evidence for his former spouse to use against him in opposing such request at the trial level.…
Continue Reading STRIKEOUT? FORMER PITCHER GRANTED RELIEF ON MOTION TO REDUCE SUPPORT
Seeking a Support Modification? File That Case Information Statement Or Else.
As we have blogged before, perhaps the most critical document in the New Jersey family law landscape is the Case Information Statement. A document designed to provide the court, parties…
Continue Reading Seeking a Support Modification? File That Case Information Statement Or Else.