Earlier today, Robert Epstein posted an interesting piece entitled The Psychology of Mediation. Whether people like it or not, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is here to stay as the new norm. Court backlogs are long and trial dates are scarce, even when you want them. Moreover, the system is set up to have numerous settlement events, from mandatory custody and parenting time mediation, to mandatory Early Settlement Panels (ESP), to mandatory economic mediation (post ESP), to Intensive Settlement Conferences (ISCs), to Intensive Settlement Panels (ISPs), to Blue Ribbon Panels, etc.
There are times when clients or other lawyers say that they don’t want to go to mediation because they feel it will be a waste of time because the case has no chance of settling. In my experience, mediation very rarely is a waste of time. Here are a few reasons why:
- This may be the first time you get a settlement proposal from the other side, even if it is off the wall.
- This may be the first time that you get a real settlement proposal such that even if you cannot settle at that point, you can start the process of moving the case toward settlement
- You may find out what are real issues and what are fake issues. In short, you may be able to narrow the issues is dispute.
- You may find out what is really important to the other side
- You may find out why things are important to the other side – the psychology of mediation so to speak
- You may find out the proposed legal basis for the other party’s position for the first time. If you don’t settle, you can use this as the opportunity to start building your defense.
- You may find out the alleged factual basis for the other party’s position for the first time and similarly use this to figure out what proofs you need to defeat that position.
- You can use the mediation to shut down bad positions – either because the other side finally sees that they are going nowhere, and/or the mediator tells them so. Of course, this can lead to the creation of new theories of the case and new arguments that you will have to rebut.
- This may be the first time that the other party (or your client too) is hearing a learned, non-biased view of their case. There are times where I think that they other side is off of the wall and that it is the lawyer, not the client that is the problem. In those cases, I may want to start mediation sooner rather than later so that the other party hears that there may be problems with the positions that they are taking. Maybe this leads to that party getting new counsel or maybe it leads to them doing some more research to confirm what they learned from the mediator.
- Mediation can demystify the process and put people in a atmosphere where there is productive dialogue, about anything, for the first time in months.
- You may learn useful information that was previously undisclosed.
- You may be able to resolve and get rid of the small issues, even if the major issues remain unresolved.
What is the take away? Don’t be so quick to dismiss the possible of benefits of mediation, even if you don’t settle. the entire case.
Eric Solotoff is the editor of the New Jersey Family Legal Blog and the Co-Chair of the Family Law Practice Group of Fox Rothschild LLP. Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Matrimonial Lawyer and a Fellow of the American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys, Eric is resident in Fox Rothschild’s Roseland and Morristown, New Jersey offices though he practices throughout New Jersey. You can reach Eric at (973)994-7501, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Photo credit: Copyright: <a href=’http://www.123rf.com/profile_tashatuvango’> / 123RF Stock Photo</a>